Classification, risk stratification and response assessment in myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS): A state-of-the-art report on behalf of the International Consortium for MDS (icMDS).

The guidelines for classification, prognostication, and response assessment of myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) have all recently been updated. In this report on behalf of the International Consortium for MDS (icMDS) we summarize these developments. We first critically examine the updated World Health Organization (WHO) classification and the International Consensus Classification (ICC) of MDS. We then compare traditional and molecularly based risk MDS risk assessment tools. Lastly, we discuss limitations of criteria in measuring therapeutic benefit and highlight how the International Working Group (IWG) 2018 and 2023 response criteria addressed these deficiencies and are endorsed by the icMDS. We also address the importance of patient centered care by discussing the value of quality-of-life assessment. We hope that the reader of this review will have a better understanding of how to classify MDS, predict clinical outcomes and evaluate therapeutic outcomes.

Global assessment of IRF8 as a novel cancer biomarker.

Interferon regulatory factor 8 (IRF8) is a member of the IRF family that is specific to the hematopoietic cell and is involved in regulating the development of human monocytic and dendritic-lineage cells, as well as B-cells. Because its utility as a sensitive and specific monoblast marker in the context of acute monocytic leukemias has been recently demonstrated, we hypothesized that it may also be useful as a novel immunohistochemical marker in myeloid sarcomas and blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasms (BPDCNs) with respect to their differential diagnoses. In this retrospective study, we analyzed the IHC expression pattern of IRF8 in 385 patient samples across 30 types of cancers, referenced to their mRNA expression data available through The Cancer Genome Atlas. In addition, we assessed IRF8 in 35 myeloid sarcomas and 15 BPDCNs. Twenty-four of 35 cases of myeloid sarcomas (68.5%) showed positivity for IRF8, with six cases (17.1%) demonstrating IRF8 expression in the absence of CD34 and MPO. All 15 of 15 BPDCNs (100%) showed strong uniform expression of IRF8 and were occasionally more definitive than CD123. IRF8 was negative in all desmoplastic small round cell tumors, Ewing sarcomas, synovial sarcomas, and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas, as well as all epithelial malignancies tested except for 2 triple negative breast cancers that showed subset weak staining. In conclusion, IRF8 is a novel marker helpful in identifying extranodal hematopoietic tumors that can otherwise be difficult to diagnose given the broad differential diagnoses and frequent loss of more common lineage-defining markers.

Marrow assessment for hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis demonstrates poor correlation with disease probability.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the amount of hemophagocytosis in 64 marrow core biopsy specimens and aspirates from 58 patients with clinical suspicion for secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) or reported findings of hemophagocytosis. METHODS: A review of medical records assigned patients to a low-risk (45 patients) or high-risk (13 patients) HLH group, and association with histologic findings was examined using the Fisher exact test. RESULTS: The amount of hemophagocytosis in aspirate or the core biopsy specimen did not correlate with disease probability (P = .17 and P = .63, respectively). Of the clinical/laboratory criteria assessed, the most significant correlations with HLH were highly elevated ferritin (P = .01), cytopenias (P = .02), and fever (P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicated that marrow histologic findings alone do not reliably predict the probability of HLH, and an isolated finding of hemophagocytosis, even when present in a high amount, lacks specificity for HLH.